Reducing the intervention of the human factor in the concreting stage improves the quality of the project under construction.
The consistencies we observe in differential gene expression patterns between life stages, and in functional classes up-regulated during larval and adult life stages, respectively, engender confidence in the quality of our data set.
The study was conducted in three stages: (1) The Quality of Life-Assessment for Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA) and the EQ-5D were administered in a representative sample of 6,875 individuals from the Belgian and 1,400 individuals from the general Dutch population.
In the second stage, trained analysts conducted additional in-depth analysis of all of the projects identified in the first stage to increase the quality of the project-level data and to generate standardized project descriptions, timelines, and estimates of the value of these projects (if available) in US dollars (USD).
Chemotherapy in breast cancer 0-II stages lowered the quality of life scores overall across the four dimensions with a disproportionately greater impact on women with lower level of education [ 5].
This is an important issue as a greater emphasis in the quality of staging represents a 'correctable' aspect of clinical management that may lead to improved patient survival.
As it has been established that the granulosa cells of large preantral and small antral healthy follicles produce the highest AMH amounts in rat [ 27] and cow [ 15, 22], prepubertal ewe lambs with higher plasma AMH concentrations are supposed to have a higher number of healthy follicles in these stages, suggesting that the quality of the oocytes and embryos coming from these ewes may be higher.
This type of involvement in all the key stages helps improve the quality of implementation through learning by doing, and also motivates the central team, and, by extension, their local-level counterparts.
In the second stage, first, the qualities of patches are evaluated by the coherence of point orientations.
Differences in ovarian cancer survival may be explained by differences in tumour biology and morphology, delay in diagnosis, the quality of the staging procedures or differences in treatment (Maringe et al, 2012).
