stage for

USAGE SUMMARY

"stage for" is correct and usable in written English.
"Stage for" can be used when describing the actions that someone takes in preparation for something - for example, "He is staging for a move to a new city."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This is a great stage for basketball.

The New York Times - Sports

That set the stage for Lobaton.

The New York Times - Sports

The stage for an upset seemed set.

The New York Times

That's the next stage for them".

The New York Times - Sports

"It's a big stage for our team.

The New York Times - Sports

"That set the stage for the flood".

The New York Times

Haven't been on stage for five years.

The Guardian

This set the stage for Louis XIV.

The New York Times - Arts

But actually, at this stage, for anyone.

The Guardian

This set the stage for religious extremists.

The New York Times

That set the stage for Thome.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "stage for" to clearly indicate that certain actions or conditions are setting the scene or preparing for a subsequent event or development. For instance, "The economic reforms set the "stage for" rapid industrial growth."

Common error

Avoid using "stage for" when referring to an immediate consequence rather than a preparatory action. "The rain caused a flood" is more direct than saying "The rain "staged for" a flood", which suggests planning rather than causation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stage for" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to indicate that something is creating the conditions or preparing the environment for a subsequent event or action. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this usage is grammatically sound and frequently encountered.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "stage for" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that something is creating conditions or preparing a setting for a future event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is acceptable for use in written English. Its use spans multiple contexts, notably in News & Media. Alternatives such as "set the scene for" and "pave the way for" offer similar meanings. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects a preparatory action rather than a direct consequence. The abundance of examples on Ludwig highlights its widespread use and versatility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

set the scene for

Replaces "stage" with "scene", focusing on creating the appropriate environment or context.

pave the way for

Emphasizes making progress possible or facilitating future developments.

lay the groundwork for

Highlights the foundational aspects of preparing for something.

create an environment for

Focuses on building a specific setting or surrounding.

establish a foundation for

Stresses the creation of a firm base or starting point.

make preparations for

Highlights the actions taken to get ready for an event or activity.

set up for

Offers a more concise way of saying "prepare" in certain contexts.

clear the deck for

Implies removing obstacles to make something possible.

prepare the ground for

Focuses on readying the circumstances or situation for something.

build a platform for

Emphasizes the creation of an opportunity or base for advancement.

FAQs

How can I use "stage for" in a sentence?

You can use "stage for" to indicate that something is creating the circumstances for a subsequent event. For example, "The successful product launch "set the stage for" significant company growth".

What's a good alternative to "stage for"?

Alternatives to "stage for" include "pave the way for", "set the scene for", and "lay the groundwork for", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "set the stage for" instead of "stage for"?

Yes, "set the stage for" is a more common and often preferred variant of "stage for". Both are grammatically correct, but "set the stage for" is more widely recognized.

What's the difference between "stage for" and "result in"?

"Stage for" implies preparation or setting the scene for something that follows, while "result in" indicates a direct consequence. The phrase "stage for" suggests more of an indirect preparation, whereas the phrase "result in" is a direct cause and effect.