Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
With regards to the confounders, we found significantly higher AMSTAR scores in SRs funded by nonprofit sources than for those funded by profit sources (7.20 vs 6.60) (P<0.001).
Similar(59)
The first author (SR) was funded by the Saastamoinen Foundation and Emil Aaltonen Foundation.
SR was funded in part by a grant from the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale.
There are two coexistent SR fund investor definitions in the literature: current SR fund investors (which we abbreviate in tables with 'SR'); current and former SR fund investors.
S: SR fund investors; I: INT investors; C: CONV investors.
The group INT already includes the former SR fund investors.
Nevertheless, SR fund investors still invest in SR funds as they are less profit orientated than INT and CONV investors.
When looking at the results for the different levels of investment in SR funds among the current and former SR fund investors, two effects are evident.
The OLR is well suited for explaining the determinants of the percentage of the portfolio invested in SR funds for those who already invest in SR funds.
Again, former SR fund investors (0%% in SR funds) hold a prominent position.
Accordingly, we assume: SR fund investors will hold a holistic view on sustainability.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com