spout outrageous

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "spout outrageous" is not correct as it lacks a noun to complete the thought.
You can use it in a context where you want to describe someone expressing outrageous statements or opinions, but it needs to be part of a larger phrase. Example: "He tends to spout outrageous claims during debates."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

This class warfare is typically crystallized by the presence of a lone female character, the inviolate daughter-of-somebody-important, a proud young woman with magnificent shoulders and flashing eyes who stands by, in a spectacular gown, all but speechless as gifted ham actors spout outrageous pirate lingo.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

His narcissism knows no bounds, and he lives by the principle that he should never back down, even when it is proven that he has spouted outrageous falsehoods.

The New Yorker

The characters, after spouting some bit of outrageous nonsense, say to their doubtful peers, "You're picturing it, and we're talking about it".

The New Yorker

Some just spout gibberish.

The New Yorker

Talking heads spout.

The New York Times

Privately he might spout off.

The New York Times

Just outrageous".

The Guardian - Sport

"25!" Outrageous.

The Guardian - Music

Completely outrageous".

The Guardian

No. Outrageous?

The New York Times

Utterly outrageous.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, follow "spout" with a noun that specifies what is being uttered (e.g., "spout nonsense", "spout opinions").

Common error

Avoid using "spout outrageous" without a direct object. Instead, complete the phrase by specifying what is being spouted, such as "outrageous claims" or "outrageous falsehoods".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "spout outrageous" functions as a verb phrase where "spout" is a verb implying the act of uttering something, and "outrageous" is an adjective describing the nature of what's being uttered. However, according to Ludwig AI, it needs a noun for grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "spout outrageous" appears in some contexts, it is grammatically incomplete and requires a direct object to be considered correct. Ludwig AI indicates that it needs a noun to complete the thought. The phrase is most commonly found in news media, where it describes the act of expressing shocking or unacceptable opinions. To improve clarity, it is best to use alternatives such as "utter outrageous statements" or to complete the phrase with a noun, like "spout outrageous claims".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

utter outrageous statements

This alternative replaces "spout" with the more formal "utter" and clarifies the object as "statements", making it grammatically complete.

voice outrageous opinions

This alternative uses "voice" instead of "spout", which implies expressing opinions, making it slightly more specific.

express outrageous views

This alternative substitutes "spout" with "express" and uses "views" which is a synonym for opinions.

make outrageous pronouncements

This alternative is more formal, using "make pronouncements" instead of "spout", implying an official or authoritative declaration.

profess outrageous beliefs

This option utilizes "profess", indicating a declaration of belief, adding a layer of conviction or assertion to the statement.

spew outrageous accusations

This alternative uses "spew", which suggests a forceful and uncontrolled release of accusations, adding a negative connotation.

air outrageous grievances

This option uses "air", suggesting the public expression of grievances, focusing on complaints or injustices.

vent outrageous feelings

This alternative uses "vent", implying a release of pent-up feelings, adding an emotional dimension to the expression.

trumpet outrageous claims

This version employs "trumpet", which suggests a loud and boastful proclamation of claims, adding an element of grandiosity.

broadcast outrageous lies

This alternative uses "broadcast", indicating a wide dissemination of lies, focusing on the spread of misinformation.

FAQs

How can I use "spout outrageous" correctly in a sentence?

The phrase needs a noun to function correctly. For example, you can say "He tends to spout "outrageous claims" during debates" or "They spout "outrageous nonsense" on social media".

What are some alternatives to "spout outrageous"?

Alternatives include "utter outrageous statements", "voice outrageous opinions", or "express outrageous views". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "spout outrageous"?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "spout outrageous" is not grammatically correct as it stands. It lacks a direct object and needs to be completed with a noun, such as "spout outrageous claims".

What does it mean to "spout outrageous statements"?

It means to express shocking or unacceptable statements forcefully and openly. The phrase implies that the statements are likely to cause offense or disagreement.