In the first two rows and first two columns of Table 5, CLM marginal effects on in-couple residence are estimated for subsamples of respondents split by education.
When half the people polled were simply asked what they thought of "the international nuclear deal with Iran," they were about evenly split, with one-third of respondents approving, 35percentt disapproving and another 32percentt unsure.
The future plans of respondents were split between those who intended to stay in the United Kingdom and those who planned to return to South Africa, as well a couple who were still undecided upon their future career location.
The sample is evenly split by gender; the average age of respondents is 43, and 64% are low income, with an annual family income below $25,000.
Notwithstanding these overall tendencies, most respondents' preferred allocation splits did not vary much from scenario to scenario, and a sizeable minority (38.2%) of respondents chose the same allocation split in all five scenarios, i.e. regardless of government spending on cancer and other medical research.
Broadly, it seems the country is roughly split on what to think, with 48percentt of respondents saying that no drugs should be legalised at all, and 11percentt answering with a "not sure".
The sample was almost equally split by country though a slightly higher proportion of respondents were from Burkina Faso (29%).
One commonly mentioned example is the split between MINAGRI and MINRD, in which a number of respondents have some confusion on the division of functions.
The final sample size was 219 respondents with a gender split of 52.97% females, 46.58% males and 0.45% of respondents (1 person) who preferred not to answer the gender question.
But a HuffPost/YouGov poll shows that Americans are split on whether this is an important undertaking -- as 32percentt of respondents say -- or "a waste of money and resources," as 42percentt consider it.
