Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(28)
The imaging findings are consistent with a fibro-osteotic nature, differentiating them from other common lesions of the spine (i.e. haemangiomas, schwannomas).
For consideration of blunt trauma affecting the sub-axial cervical spine (i.e. trauma of the cervical spine below the craniocervical junction), the reader is directed to other such dedicated reviews [1].
In this experiment, a local coordinate system is defined based on the positions of a hip (i.e., Phip), a spine (i.e., Pspine), and a pelvis (i.e., Ppelvis) tracked by motion capture systems.
The patient-centered model of care directly addresses important limits of surgical care of the lumbar spine, i.e., the lack of effective methods for increasing patient participation and engagement in post-operative follow-up.
Although the three proteins display a similar pattern of mobility, differences in fluctuations between the wt-LOX-1 and the mutants are observed for the residues belonging to the basic spine (i.e. arginines 208, 229, 231, 248).
(M ) The number of presynaptic boutons that contact a dendritic spine (i.e., synapses formed per spine) is not significantly different between WT, Plxna2 −/− and Sema5A −/− GCs.
Similar(32)
Due to the lack of survival of filopodia on several days, stability analyses only included pre-existing spines, i.e. spines present at the beginning of the experiment.
Each of the branches in turn has 3 spines (i, j, k, l) where the parallel fibers terminate.
Unisynaptic spines (i.e., spines contacting only one presynaptic puncta; either VGlut1 or VGlut2) and SMECs in various configurations were successfully detected.
We detected no significant change in the densities of persistent spines (i. e. stable for at least one week; Figure 1f) and lost spines (i. e. disappearing from one to the consecutive imaging session; Figure 1g) in P301S Tau mice.
Dendritic spines (i.e., postsynaptic structures) of neurons form synaptic contacts that are involved in neuronal computational processes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com