In such human-dominated and heterogeneous landscapes, spillover across habitat types, especially in systems that differ in resource availability, may be an important ecological process structuring communities.
Operationally, two types of spillover should be considered: ecological spillover (i.e. the net export of juvenile, subadult and adult biomass from MPAs outwards driven by density-dependent processes) and the fishery spillover (i.e. the proportion of this biomass that can be fished, taking into account regulations and accessibility).
None of these empirical analyses investigated the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening examinations simultaneously and if there are possible spillover effects from one type of examination to the other type of examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model.
In the period from 2005 to 2012, the positive spillover effect of both types of collaboration spreads to second-tier regions.
Insights from theories of economic growth, particularly of the sources of economic innovation, suggest an important role for the spillover effects of particular types of ecosystem engineering.
This study compares the university spillover effect of two types of knowledge, localized knowledge from domestic collaboration and distant knowledge from international collaboration, and investigates their spillover effect on local firms' innovation.
It is particularly important to research the volatility spillover effect in different types of financial markets in different regions through the stochastic volatility model.
Critical questions such as what factors influence individual business decisions to reopen, how re-opening of a business in one location would affect the decision of neighboring establishments to re-open (i.e., the spatial spillover impacts) and what types of aid strategies would be most effective will be addressed in the next phase of the project that focuses on spatial modeling.
No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model.
The inclusion of lagged dependent variables for breast and cervical cancer screening makes a distinction between unobserved heterogeneity and state dependence possible, and potential dynamic spillover effects from one type of cancer screening to the other type of cancer screening for the women can be analysed.
