spikes than for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "spikes than for" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be a fragment that lacks context and proper grammatical structure, making it unusable in written English. Example: "The data shows that there are more spikes than for the previous month."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In contrast, the increase in locking from CC to UE spikes (Fig. 8 A, right) is markedly stronger for Hi spikes than for all amplitude spikes.

Cerebral Cortex

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was shown in (de Jongh et al. 2005) that the SNR of MEG is higher than EEG for frontal areas so MEG yields more spikes than EEG for frontal lobe epilepsy.

Brain Topography

At the base of the spike, where the E1 molecules make contacts between spikes, the radius of gyration was up to 5.8 Å less for the i3 spike than for the q3 spike (Table 7).

eLife

For example, MEF cells having only 5948 SNPs generates a more noticeable amount of spikes than data for ESCs with 23 838 SNPs.

Genes to Cells

This suggests that reverse-order reactivation tendency is weaker for later spikes in the spike train than for those that fired first.

European Journal of Neuroscience

The facilitation PTN shown in Figure 2A became active soon after HPR, but the activation was much more pronounced for execution (dashed line in averaged spike activity) than for observation (solid lines).

Current Biology

However, this tends to give central spike trains with fewer spikes than the average spike number in the collection.

The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience

However, for the same OHN stimulation (20 Hz for 10 s), we estimated that OH transmission generated ∼5-fold more spikes than glutamate (during 0 60 s relative to the stimulation; in CNQX: 25.2 ± 6.6 spikes, n = 16 versus in SB + TCS: 5.1 ± 0.9 spikes, n = 26; p < 0.001 by unpaired t test; see also Figure 1D).

Cell Reports

A status epilepticus was defined as continuous epileptic activity including rhythmic focal or generalized spikes lasting for more than 5 min and was considered as therapy-refractory in case of persistent epileptic activity in spite of at least two lines of antiepileptic drugs.

Annals of Intensive Care

We chose to present the data as averaged ΔF/F rather than spike trains for two main reasons: first, while our algorithm of transforming individual calcium responses to spike trains robustly detected firing events, determining the exact number of action potentials in each event was less reliable especially when firing is more intense as in our case.

eLife

The fact that the LC-LC peak area for the "spike before extraction" is slightly smaller than for the spike added to the crude extract indicates that the extraction efficiency is not 100%% but still acceptable.

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "spikes than for" in formal writing. Replace it with grammatically correct alternatives like "more spikes than" or "spikes compared to" for clear and accurate comparisons.

Common error

A common error is using "spikes than for" when intending to compare. Remember that "than" is a comparative conjunction, and the structure should be "more [something] than [something else]" or "[something] compared to [something else]".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "spikes than for" is typically intended to serve a comparative function, aiming to compare the quantity, intensity, or duration of spikes in one context versus another. However, as Ludwig AI highlights, the phrase is grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "spikes than for" is grammatically incorrect. While it appears in various contexts, including scientific and news-related articles, its usage is flawed. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase does not follow standard grammar rules. A more appropriate way to express the intended comparison would be to use phrases like "more spikes than" or "spikes compared to". Therefore, avoid using "spikes than for" and opt for clearer, grammatically sound alternatives to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more spikes compared to

This alternative directly replaces "than for" with "compared to" for a more standard comparison.

more spikes than

This option removes "for" for a grammatically correct comparison.

spikes greater than

This replaces "than for" with "greater than", focusing on magnitude or size.

spikes exceeding

This alternative uses "exceeding" to indicate surpassing a specific quantity or level of spikes.

spikes surpassing

This conveys a similar meaning to "exceeding" but may be slightly more formal.

spikes in excess of

This alternative uses "in excess of" to indicate a quantity greater than a particular amount.

spikes larger than

This choice emphasizes the size or magnitude of the spikes.

spikes more intense than

This focuses on the intensity of the spikes in comparison.

spikes more frequent than

This considers the frequency of the spikes in comparison.

spikes of higher magnitude than

This highlights that the magnitude of some spikes is higher compared to the magnitude of other spikes.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "spikes" in a comparative sentence?

Use "more spikes than" or "spikes compared to" followed by what you're comparing it with. For example, "There were "more spikes than" expected" is correct.

What is a better way to phrase "spikes than for"?

Replace "spikes than for" with alternatives such as "spikes compared to" or simply ""more spikes than"". These options provide clarity and adhere to standard English grammar.

Is "spikes than for" grammatically correct?

No, "spikes than for" is not grammatically correct. The correct comparative structure involves using "than" followed by the element being compared, or using "compared to" instead.

What's the difference between "spikes than for" and "more spikes than"?

"Spikes than for" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear meaning. "More spikes than" is the correct way to compare the quantity of spikes; for example, "There were more spikes than usual".