spending cuts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "spending cuts" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in discussions about budget reductions or financial policies where expenditures are decreased. Example: "The government announced a series of spending cuts aimed at reducing the national deficit."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Which spending cuts?

The New York Times

And domestic spending cuts.

The New Yorker

Spending cuts are proceeding.

The Economist

Democrats reject spending cuts.

The New York Times

Spending cuts can, too.

The New York Times

Opponents fear deeper spending cuts.

The New York Times

Government spending cuts in Portugal.

The New York Times

Spending cuts should hit everybody.

The Economist

Second, there are spending cuts.

The New York Times

The second is spending cuts.

The Economist

Others wanted more spending cuts.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing government policy, be specific about which areas are affected by "spending cuts". Provide context and quantify the reductions whenever possible to enhance clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "spending cuts" without specifying the sectors or programs affected. Broad statements can be misleading and lack the necessary precision for informed discussion. Always aim to provide context and details about where the cuts are being implemented.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "spending cuts" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It typically serves as the subject or object of a sentence, referring to the action or process of reducing expenditures, as Ludwig AI examples show.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Formal & Business

15%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "spending cuts" is a very common noun phrase used to describe reductions in expenditures, particularly in governmental or organizational budgets. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely employed in neutral contexts such as news, business, and academic discussions. While the phrase itself is objective, the topic is often politically charged, and it's crucial to provide specific context regarding the affected sectors. Alternatives like "budget reductions" or "fiscal austerity" can be used depending on the desired nuance and formality. When using the phrase, be precise and avoid overgeneralizations to ensure clear and accurate communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

budget reductions

Focuses on the overall reduction of a budget, rather than specific areas of spending.

reduced public spending

Specifically highlights the reduction in governmental or public expenditures.

expenditure reductions

A more formal term emphasizing the decrease in the amount of money spent.

fiscal austerity

Refers to a broader policy of reducing government spending and debt.

cost-cutting initiatives

Emphasizes proactive measures taken to reduce expenses.

trimming the budget

Implies careful and selective reductions in spending.

belt-tightening measures

An idiomatic expression suggesting a need to spend less due to financial constraints.

financial retrenchment

A formal term suggesting a deliberate reduction in financial activity.

decreased outlays

A technical term referring to a decrease in funds disbursed.

downsizing government

Suggests a reduction in the size and scope of governmental operations and associated spending.

FAQs

How are "spending cuts" typically implemented?

"Spending cuts" are implemented through various methods, including reducing budgets for specific government programs, freezing hiring, and eliminating certain services. The specific approach depends on the goals and priorities of the governing body.

What are the potential consequences of "spending cuts"?

The consequences of "spending cuts" can vary depending on the scale and scope of the reductions. Potential consequences include reduced services, job losses, and slower economic growth. However, they can also lead to greater efficiency and fiscal stability.

What can I say instead of "spending cuts"?

You can use alternatives like "budget reductions", "expenditure reductions", or "fiscal austerity" depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Are "spending cuts" always a negative thing?

"Spending cuts" are not inherently negative. While they can lead to reduced services and job losses, they can also promote fiscal responsibility and efficiency. The impact depends on how and where the cuts are implemented.