Sentence examples for spend subsidising from inspiring English sources
The phrase "spend subsidising" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the allocation of funds or resources to support a particular cause or initiative. Example: "The government plans to spend subsidising renewable energy projects to promote sustainability."
Instead, we will let local councils build housing, create jobs, stimulate the economy, and bring down the billions we spend subsidising landlords".
The UN Development Programme says rich countries should switch some of the staggering $35 billion a year they spend subsidising fishing on the high seas (through things like cheap fuel and vessel-buy-back programmes) to creating marine reserves protected areas like national parks.Others focus on institutional reform.
About £30bn a year is spent subsidising pension contributions through tax breaks.
For Telefonica, the millions of euros that the ZTE Open may end up costing it will be money well spent if it means less money spent subsidising higher-end handsets in future.
Spending on incapacity benefit is now forecast to remain flat for the next five years while a continuation of the trend in housing benefit will drive up the £20bn spent subsidising low-income workers' rent payments.
"You can get 200 years-worth of erosion happening in 20 years," says Ingval Maxwell, conservation director of Historic Scotland, a government agency.The problem appears to be worst in Scotland, particularly in Glasgow, where millions of taxpayers' pounds were spent subsidising stone-cleaning as part of the city's post-industrial renaissance.
The state oil company has been billing the treasury to recoup the money it spends subsidising the price of kerosene.
In landscapes where private land tenure is prevalent, public funds for ecological landscape restoration are sometimes spent subsidising the revegetation of cleared land, and the protection of remnant vegetation from livestock.
Their projects swallow up about two-thirds of the budget of the Department of Energy and Climate Change; Sellafield alone costs £1.7 billion ($2.8 billion) a year, almost as much as the roughly £2 billion spent subsidising renewable energy in 2013.
Although many states have increased the amount of money they spend on subsidising child care, most still fail to offer an affordable service.
This is because we were asked by the government to consider bids from institutions where an 'average tuition charge (after waivers) is at or below £7,500 per year' (White Paper executive summary para 8)." The government – or rather the treasury – prefers fee waivers because they reduce the amount it has to spend on subsidising the student loan system.
