Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

spell disaster for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "spell disaster for" is correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation that promises trouble or a bad outcome. For example, "The recent changes to the contract could spell disaster for the company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

This strategy could however spell disaster for Democrats.

Cold Temperatures Spell Disaster for HWA…Or Do They?

But the charges won't necessarily spell disaster for SAC.

News & Media

The New York Times

His philosophy could only spell disaster for himself.

If done wrong it can spell disaster for brands.

News & Media

The Guardian

Does Facebook's plummeting stock spell disaster for the social network?

The market's shrug could spell disaster for DoCoMo.

News & Media

The New York Times

Does all this spell disaster for the industry?

"That would spell disaster for us and our planet".

News & Media

The Guardian

And that can spell disaster for their physical and emotional health.

This, the scientists predict, could spell disaster for many animals and ecosystems.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "spell disaster for" when emphasizing the potential for significant negative consequences, especially in situations involving risk, uncertainty, or high stakes. This phrase is effective in conveying a sense of impending doom or failure.

Common error

Avoid using "spell disaster for" in everyday conversations or trivial situations. Its strong connotation of impending calamity is best reserved for scenarios where the potential negative outcomes are truly significant.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "spell disaster for" functions as a verb phrase that acts as a predictor of negative outcomes. As Ludwig AI confirms, it correctly indicates an event or situation is highly likely to cause significant adversity or ruin. It is frequently observed to modify nouns or noun phrases, suggesting negative consequences.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Academia

19%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "spell disaster for" is a potent phrase used to highlight the strong possibility of negative consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. Predominantly found in "News & Media" and "Academia", it functions to warn or alert to potential calamities. While versatile, reserving it for scenarios with significant, not trivial, negative outcomes is best. Alternative phrases like "lead to catastrophe for" or "result in calamity for" can provide nuanced variations. Thus, understanding the function, purpose, and register of "spell disaster for" allows writers to effectively convey the gravity of a situation.

FAQs

How can I use "spell disaster for" in a sentence?

You can use "spell disaster for" to describe a situation that is likely to have extremely negative consequences. For example, "A failure to address climate change will "spell disaster for" future generations."

What are some alternatives to "spell disaster for"?

You can use alternatives like "lead to catastrophe for", "result in calamity for", or "cause ruin for" depending on the context and the level of formality required.

Is it appropriate to use "spell disaster for" in formal writing?

Yes, "spell disaster for" is suitable for formal writing, especially when discussing serious topics such as environmental issues, economic downturns, or political instability. However, consider the tone and audience to ensure it aligns with the overall message.

What is the difference between "spell disaster for" and "create problems for"?

"Spell disaster for" implies a much more severe and far-reaching negative impact than "create problems for". The former suggests a catastrophic outcome, while the latter simply indicates difficulties or challenges.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: