Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The present article reports the development and psychometric validation of a novel instrument, the Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire (VISQ), designed to assess the phenomenological properties of inner speech along dimensions of dialogicality, condensed/expanded quality, evaluative/motivational nature, and the extent to which inner speech incorporates other people's voices.
Primary outcome measures were the teacher rated School Speech Questionnaire (SSQ) and diagnostic status.
The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire is an 18-item self-report scale measuring four dimensions of inner speech.
The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire (VISQ; McCarthy-Jones & Fernyhough, 2011) assesses four characteristics of inner speech: dialogicality, evaluative/ motivational content, condensation, and the presence of other people.
Mean scores on the SSQ are presented in Table 3.> -wrap-foot> schoolhool speech questionnaire, SMQ selective mutism questionnaire, CGI clinical global impression scale including a severity- and an improvement rating School Speech Questionnaire SSQQ) results further indicated a more pronounced increase in speech in younger children.
However, a significant increase of speech was found after treatment, with no change in wait-list controls, as rated by the teacher on the School speech questionnaire (SSQ) [ 4].
Similar(54)
Additional data include the results of the adult listeners' analysis of child speech, questionnaires, as well as annotation for gender and age in months.
Previously used inner speech questionnaires (although not the VISQ) have been criticised for showing a lack of convergent validity (Uttl, Morin, & Hamper, 2011) and it has been suggested that self-reported inner speech is likely to be overestimated in general questionnaires (Hurlburt et al., 2013).
To reduce practice and novelty effects, subjects were shown the CEF and trained to perform the following procedures: symptom questionnaire, speech and neurobehavioral tasks, salivary sampling for cortisol and estradiol, nasal lavage, and spirometry.
Various methods of investigating inner speech exist, including questionnaires (Duncan & Cheyne, 1999; Morin, Uttl, & Hamper, 2011), experience sampling (Hurlburt et al., 2013) and task-based methods (Murray, 1967).
Evaluation of student performance with two different formats for courseware integration is based upon data from pre- and post-tests for preparing speech texts, and a questionnaire survey.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com