Exact(19)
The time-variant nature of the speech production system can be exploited for this purpose.
Speaking and exercising compete for some of the same resources, and exercise affects the speech production system.
In this paper we use the modulation spectrum directly to exploit the continuity constraints imposed by the speech production system.
Future research will permit increased specificity with regard to the neurofunctional architecture of the speech production system.
Exercising or otherwise performing a strenuous physical task, referred to here as physical task stress, influences the behavior of the speech production system.
The presence of physical task stress induces changes in the speech production system which in turn produces changes in speaking behavior.
Similar(41)
In order to realize the time-variance-based inverse filter estimation, we introduce a joint estimation of the inverse filters of both the time-invariant room acoustic and the time-variant speech production systems, and present two estimation algorithms with distinct properties.
Due to the inherent differences in the speech production systems of female and male subjects, it is appropriate to deal with pathological speech classification separately for each gender [ 21].
Another possible explanation is that the differential left > right connectivity from a bilateral anterior temporal lobe semantic system to left prefrontal speech production systems might explain why the left anterior temporal pole damage correlates with semantic naming errors (Lambon Ralph et al., 2001; Walker et al, 2010).
It is also important to note that speech production and perception systems overlap extensively so that many of the regions used to perceive a voice are also used in thinking and speaking (e.g. STS, Spt).
During speech production, the articulatory motor system is considered to control the movements of the articulators and generate predictions (or forward models) of the sensory consequences of these movements, which are sent to sensory systems and compared with the actual sensory input (Wolpert and Flanagan 2001; Guenther 2006; Rauschecker and Scott 2009; Hickok et al. 2011).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com