Sentence examples for speech evaluations from inspiring English sources
The most similar evaluations to our evaluation are the MediaEval 2011 and 2012 Search on Speech evaluations [33, 34].
The automatic speech evaluations were compared to a control group of 40 speakers without speech pathology in this study.
It was also hard to apply clinical experiments because the results of speech evaluations differ from each therapist.
Besides the MediaEval Search on Speech Evaluations, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the USA organized in 2006 the NIST STD evaluation [31].
Although our evaluation results cannot be directly compared with those obtained in MediaEval 2011 and 2012 Search on Speech evaluations [33, 34] because the database used for experimentation is different, we can mention that our results are the worst (the best performance of MediaEval 2011 is ATWV=0.222 and that of MediaEval 2012 is ATWV=0.740).
Information was gathered utilizing parent questionnaires, child speech evaluations and physical examinations of the children's mouths conducted by a pediatrician.
As a regular protocol in speech evaluation, these praxias were evaluated for coordination, skill, and symmetry of lingual and labial muscles.
Outcomes were assessed by measurements of tongue mobility, speech evaluation, and parent questionnaires.
These findings support the need for objective and automatic speech evaluation.
The final speech evaluation corpus was stripped down to 200 sentences for each speaker since several utterances were deemed unusable.
Plain and contrast lateral-cephalograms were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively, and speech evaluation was performed by the same authorized speech therapist at the same time points.
