Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Specimens without treatment were used as control group (CO).
Similar(59)
Regarding to Young's Modulus, specimens without surface treatment, present higher value than specimens with surface treatment (except specimen with 1% for 125 250 particle size).
Specimens without surface treatment present higher strain values than specimens with surface treatment.
Specimens with plasma surface treatment present a lower value of maximum strain, on the other hand, specimens without surface treatment present higher maximum strain values but also a higher dispersion of the results.
The fracture surfaces are in agreement with the results obtained in tensile tests as the specimens that present less the brittle behavior are the specimens without surface treatment and 1% of cork, regardless of the particle size.
Specimens with surface plasma treatment present lower values of maximum tensile stress than specimens without surface treatments, and in some cases lower than the neat resin.
For specimens without surface treatments, small particles and higher amounts of cork particles present higher strain value whereas a small amount of bigger particles present worse results than the neat resin.
In this regression, surface treatment is a dummy variable, taking the value "0" for specimens without plasma surface treatment and "1" for specimens with plasma surface treatment.
Specimens with plasma surface treatment have a more brittle fracture surface than specimens without plasma surface treatment.
Inversely, the behaviour of specimens without plasma surface treatment differs with particle size, as specimens with small particles present higher values of maximum strain.
A specimen A. minus bract was mounted upon a "well" microscope slide in distilled water (it is a feature of both confocal and atomic force microscopy that specimens may be mounted without treatment) and placed under the objective of a confocal microscope.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com