Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
All specimens were compared with the normal rabbit ACL structure.
The performances of specimens were compared with the control mix and the fibre-reinforced mix.
The test results for the reinforced specimens were compared with that for the unreinforced sample.
Tumor FNA and blood specimens were compared with BRAF genetic analysis and cross-sectional imaging.
To confirm this conjecture, the effective moment of inertia of the specimens were compared under a yield load.
Test specimens were compared in terms of strength, stiffness and energy dissipation capacities as well as damage indices.
The behaviour and failure modes of the pristine and retrofitted specimens were compared.
The surface appearances of the test specimens were compared to each other.
The experimental results of the five groups of specimens were compared.
All UHPC specimens were compared to the plain UHPC and metakaolined UHPC mixes.
The surface and inner parts of compression-moulded, injection-moulded and drawn specimens were compared.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com