Suggestions(1)
Exact(9)
The specimens were assembled using 1 mm spacers between adherends to attain the correct value of overlap length.
Six full-scale unreinforced non-grouted masonry wall specimens were assembled and then retrofitted using Sprayable EDCC.
The specimens were assembled in a clinical simulation device and tested in an Instron Universal Testing Machine, with a load cell of 10 N.
For this reason, all the specimens were assembled together in order to minimize undesired effects caused by the clamped devices, for example, pre-stress due to assembly (Figure 4).
In this investigation, the test specimens were assembled using stainless bolts in a fin plate and web cleat connections which were identical to those tested by Yu et al. The experimental test results are compared with the results and conclusions of the earlier experiments by Yu (Yu et al. 2009, 2009) and also with component-based model analysis.
The test specimens were assembled per manufacturer instructions, and mounted in UHMWPE blocks.
Similar(51)
After trimming, forward and reverse sequences for each specimen were assembled, each assembled contig was examined and edited by hand, and each sequence was checked for stop codons.
Tissue cores from each specimen were assembled on a recipient paraffin block with a precision instrument (Micro Digital Co. Korea), following previously established methods [ 12].
Multiple strands obtained for each specimen were assembled in CodonCode Aligner v. 1.3.4 (CodonCode Corporation) or Sequencher v. 4 (Gene Codes Corporation).
One hundred and sixty-one tissue cores from each specimen were assembled on a recipientissueffin blocoresth a precision instrument (Micro Digital Co. Korea).
The specimen was assembled using unpropped construction methods and had a degree of shear connection equal to 33%, significantly lower than the minimum required amount specified in Eurocode 4. A uniformly distributed load was applied to the specimen, which was increased until the failure occurred characterized by yielding of the steel beam.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com