Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
The hardness of the non-immersed specimens was approximately 260 throughout the specimens, irrespective of the specimen microstructure.
The flexural stiffness of the specimens was approximately 15% of the flexural stiffness by the New Zealand Standard with the assumption that the supports were fixed.
The size of the specimens was approximately 2 × 2 mm and included junction epithelia and soft connective tissue.
Similar(57)
The measured lateral resistances of slender specimens are approximately 130% of the calculated flexural strength.
The results indicated that the quantities of XPF expression of BCC and SCC specimens were approximately 57.0 and 76.4% less than that of normal skins, respectively.
The LBE volume of in the loop is 250 l and the maximum flow velocity in the region of specimens is approximately 1 m s−1.
The root-mean-square (RMS) values of all specimens were approximately 60 nm, and no obvious changes of the RMS value were observed after the sealing layer insertion.
The shear strengths of the NC-100 and SCC-100 specimens were approximately 3.0 and 3.2 times greater than the theoretical results, respectively, while both the NC-50 and SCC-50 specimens were approximately 1.8 times greater than the theoretical results.
The shear strengths of the NC-100 and SCC-100 specimens were approximately 1.9 and 2.1 times greater than the theoretical results, respectively, while both the NC-50 and SCC-50 specimens were approximately 2.3 and 2.4 times greater than the theoretical results, respectively.
The shear strengths of the NC-100 and SCC-100 specimens were approximately 2.7 and 2.8 times greater than the theoretical values, respectively, while the strengths of both the NC-50 and SCC-50 specimens were approximately 2.5 times greater than the theoretical values.
Since the amount of steel loss in both types of specimens were approximately the same, the group of specimens that yielded higher reduction in maximum compression load would be the ones that suffered greater corrosion damage.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com