Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
For the notched specimens, the strength decreased slightly compared with that of unnotched specimens, which could be attributed to the stress concertation accommodation mechanism.
It was found that after an initial increase in compressive strength at 250 °C for the mortar specimens, the strength decreased considerably at higher temperatures.
In the design of the test specimens, the strength of the panel zone was deliberately changed by altering its thickness, to reduce the risk of shear failure in the panel zone.
However, due to the variability in the porosity of the test specimens, the strength improvement with age is difficult to determine.
Similar(56)
Unlike the control specimen, the strength gradually decreased due to the shear reinforcement after the compression failure of concrete.
As the stiffness of the specimen is increased, the density would be greater for the specimens, and the strength of the specimens would be high and with high ultimate carrying capacity (Fig. 15).
The analysis results showed that the proposed method can simulate the entire load deformation behavior of the test specimens, including the strength and deformation capacity.
The test results showed that, in the case of the concentrically loaded specimens, the uniaxial strength was greater than the design strength ( P_{o} = 0.85f^{prime}_{c} A_{c} + f_{ys} A_{s} + f_{yl} A_{l} ) (A c, A s, A l = area of concrete, steel, or longitudinal bars, and f yl = yield strength of longitudinal bars) due to the confinement effect.
Shown in Table 3 are the dimension of the specimens, the compression strength of the single form block, and the material test strength of the grouted concrete and bearing mortar.
Compared to pristine specimens, the fatigue strength of damaged specimens is significantly reduced in both materials.
For dry specimens, the fatigue strength under negative pulse waveform was higher than that under the positive pulse waveform.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com