Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Also, the variable shear angle observed on failed specimens is better captured numerically in presence of inhomogeneities.
Similar(59)
The T6 heat-treated and hot-isostatic-pressed specimens were better with respect to both strength and ductility, as compared to the as-cast specimens.
Both attachment and proliferation of osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells on the HS specimens were better than that on the AC ones.
In the performance of corrosion resistance, all coated specimens were better than that of the uncoated one in 3.5 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution, and the sequence was DLC/EN-ADI > EN-ADI > DLC-ADI > ADI.
Neandertals and modern humans groups slightly overlap at the centre of the chart while Early Pleistocene specimens are better segregated.
The specimens were better preserved and were of sufficient size (31.2 mm versus 3.5 mm) especially for sessile and flat lesions.
The electrochemical performance of the Al3+ F−-co-substituted specimen wAl3+ F−-co-substitutedsubstituted one but worse thAl3+ F−-co-substitutedd one.
Moreover, the macroscopic completeness of the resected specimen was better for the robotic group, and robotic surgery was associated with quicker return of oral intake, shorter length of stay, and a lower serious complication rate (5.4% vs. 19.3%).
It is shown that from a staircase test with measured inclusion size on the broken specimens it is better to use both load levels and inclusion sizes to estimate the inclusion size distribution instead of using just the different load levels.
The results are very promising for the application of the CVD-FBR process as a surface modification technology since the behaviour of the coated specimens is much better than that of the uncoated ones.
While tissue integrity in FFPE specimens is often better preserved than in matched fresh-frozen (FF) counterparts, the quality of nucleic acids in FFPE samples is far from optimal due to chemical crosslinking and nucleic acid fragmentation [ 6- 8].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com