Sentence examples for specimens for primary from inspiring English sources

This is not likely in the present study because almost all the specimens for primary culture were processed on different days over several months.

Single biopsy specimens of primary tumours performed for diagnostic purposes, which are frequently archival, may not fully represent a genetically diverse malignancy with multiple metastatic sites, and sequencing techniques may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect low frequency events in tumour subclones.

Forty-six malignantmandgnant and non-malignant) kidney specimens from primary tumours were used for total RNA isolation.

Another set comprising 30 frozen specimens of primary ccRCCs were also used for array CGH and quantitative RT-PCR.

Eighty FFPE specimens from primary invasive breast tumors were initially collected for use in the present study.

A total of 48 specimens of primary tumours and 50 specimens of metastases of ovarian carcinomas were examined for E-cadherin and Snail immunoreactivity, of which 47 cases were matched pairs of primary tumours and their corresponding metastases.

Through an analysis of observed species richness and complementarity, accumulation curves, and richness estimators, we conduct an a posteriori analysis of five bioblitz-style collection strategies that differed in terms of total duration, number of sites, protocol flexibility to heterogeneous habitats, sorting of specimens for analysis, and primary purpose of collection.

This study describes the feasibility of introduction, diagnostic accuracy and costs of the MGIT rapid culture system for primary specimens and FLD DST, coupled with rapid molecular systems for TB culture identification and detection of resistance to isoniazid and rifampin in Samara, Russia, a middle income region with a high burden of MDR TB [5], [9], [28].

Respondents who had been responsible for primary specimen and data collection identified different barriers and motivations as compared with those who had conducted secondary analyses of specimens and data collected by others.

These differences may reflect closer interactions between investigators responsible for primary specimen and data collection and the participants in their studies, or may derive from these investigators' greater ability to provide results through established contact pathways.

We have characterised a panel of ALL cell lines for growth and drug resistance and compared data with that published for primary patient specimens.