Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
The practice of analyzing gross or pooled hippocampal specimens fails to take into account these obvious differences and may skew ensuing results.
Similar(59)
Histopathological evaluation of the tendon specimens failed to differentiate between the control rats and the running rats.
A substantial number of surgical specimens failed to demonstrate specific neuronal cell loss (n = 34, 19%), despite electrophysiological evidence for seizure generation within the mesial temporal lobe.
Nonetheless, two subsequent immunohistochemical studies in 198 [ 53] and 410 [ 54] bladder cancer specimens failed to detect PR signals (Table 1).
Twenty nine specimens failed to provide a sequence for both plastid markers, creating 871 specimens with sequence records for both ITS2 and one of these genes (rbcL & matK from 68%, rbcL & ITS2 from 82%).
Three specimens failed to produce results in the assay: one due to low ATP counts at the end of the assay, while the other cultures became infected, probably due to low level contamination within the samples.
Two additional specimens failed to generate a valid result using any of the three testing methods at both sites or 454 and were also excluded from the data analysis.
Observations on several specimens of nerve cords of Metaperipatus blainvillei and Epiperipatus biolleyi sectioned in sagittal, horizontal, and transverse planes, or examined as whole-mount preparations (E. biolleyi: 3 specimens; M. blainvillei: 22 specimens) failed to reveal distinct segmental thickenings (cf. Figures 5C and 5D; Figure 6; further data not shown).
Multiple serial sections of the tumor specimen failed to detect any adenomatous component.
Culture of the biopsy specimen failed to grow R. equi or mycobacteria, and the result of 16S rRNA PCR was negative.
Specimens failed due to either cyclic creep/ratcheting, to an interaction between cyclic creep/ratcheting and fatigue, or to surface fatigue crack nucleation and growth only.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com