Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Of the 94 metastasis specimens assessed by IHC, 64 (68.1%) were negative for HER2 expression according to both IHC and FISH, two were positive according to both techniques, and 7 (7.4%) gave equivocal IHC results (Table 4).
Among all the specimens assessed by RT-PCR for TTC-40 expression, only 41 available cases were tested for methylation status: three NPC xenografts, 32 primary tumors, and 6 nontumors (Table 3).
As to the 39 metastasis specimens assessed by IHC, 22 cases were negative by both IHC and FISH, 7 were positive by both techniques and 10 cases were ICH equivocal, 9 of which resulted FISH negative (Table 4).
Similarly, FOXO1A was generally expressed at low levels in the 83 cancer specimens assessed by Su et al. These data suggest that the expression level of FOXO1A in the PER-453 cell line is exceptionally high relative to the levels in most normal and cancerous tissues.
Similar(56)
The contact angles of the specimens were assessed by dropping 0.4 mL of distilled water on specimens and measured using a video-based goniometer (EA-01, Jeteazy Co., Ltd., Hsinchu, Taiwan).
The surgical specimens, assessed in a standardised way, were reviewed by one pathologist (CM), following the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage system, 2010.
The transverse rupture strength (TRS) of the specimens was assessed by a three-point bending test.
The corrosion resistance of the specimens were assessed by different electrochemical measurement techniques.
The oxidation behaviour of the coated specimens was assessed by air furnace oxidation tests at 1100 °C for up to 450 h.
The oxidation behavior of the coating specimens was assessed by air furnace oxidation tests at 1100 °C for up to 200 h.
The performance of unprotected and protected concrete specimens was assessed by means of the following procedures, indicated in EN 1504-2 standard: (i) product penetration depth; (ii) water absorption by immersion; (iii) abrasion resistance; (iv) impact resistance; and (v) bond strength.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com