Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The size and shear strength of the specimens are comparable to those of a 10- to 12-year-old child (Chung et al. 1976; Ipsen et al. 2002).
This study suggests that urine specimens are comparable to cervical swabs in screening high-risk groups for C. trachomatis by the SDA method (BDPT).
Swab specimens are comparable to nasopharyngeal washes for influenza detection; however, swabs are more acceptable to families and less expensive to obtain (15 – 15 ).
Specifically, fewer than half of the studies reported the bone mineral density of their specimens, which is essential for ensuring testing specimens are comparable and the results can be interpreted within the context of other published studies.
Similar(56)
Corrosion potential (ECORR) and polarization resistance measurements (Rp) in the presence of H2O2 suggests that the anodic reactivity of all the specimens is comparable and high compared to 1.5 at% SIMFUEL.
The average compressive strength of sediment-based concrete specimens is comparable to that of reference concrete.
The specimens in the present study are of comparable size to those in a 10-year-old child and the shear strength of the anteriorly loaded specimens was comparable to the values reported by Chung et al. [[12]].
The life improvement factors for the open-hole and joint specimens were comparable provided that the degree of cold expansion is the same.
The degree of varus collapse (8.5 ± 7.7°) and rotation (7.2 ± 6.4°) in cadaveric specimens were comparable to that in surrogate specimens, with the surrogate specimens showing significantly less variability.
The strengths of the SBCC specimens were comparable to those of the ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC) specimens with 3-day curing and about 22 38% much higher than those of OPCC cylindrical concrete specimens at 7 91 days of age.
The results indicate that both the RACFST and NACFST specimens have a similar deformation shape, and the impact resistance of the RACFST specimens is comparable to that of the NACFST.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com