Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Specimens and datasets are well maintained, sample sizes are large, specimen background information is recorded, and multiple incidence assays and potential supplemental tests have been measured on the same specimens.
Similar(11)
An assessment of both AutoMal and MaLabel in view of medium-scale (4000 specimens) and expansive scale datasets (more than 115,000 samples) collected and broke down via AutoMal shows AMAL's adequacy in precisely describing, ordering, and gathering malware tests.
Out of the 18 genes detected by RT-qPCR in the 22 FFPE specimens, 14 genes were significantly differentially expressed among the four clinical subtypes (ANOVA test, P < 0.05) as well as their array expression by using both FNAB and FFPE specimens, and in the two validation datasets.
Specimens collected ≤ 90 days from the same individual were excluded to create a stringent criterion to eliminate duplicate specimens and create a case-based dataset.
Despite the small datasets (35 bone specimens and 80 kidney transplants), the two models achieved high accuracy of 98.3% and 85%, respectively.
These data were confirmed by analyzing S100A16 mRNA levels in laser captured microdissected specimens and in three independent OSCC microarray datasets (Fig. 2).
Interactive graphs and datasets available at my Plot.ly profile here.
Metagenomic sequences of fecal specimens (53 datasets from 45 separate individuals) were generated during the investigation of the enteroaggregative/Shiga-toxin producing E. coli O104:H4 foodborne disease outbreak [ 34] and were processed in this report with WG-FAST.
This dataset contains 68 clinical tissue specimens, and was assessed using a microarray with 43,931 oligonucleotide probes.
The selection criteria were that the dataset should contain ≥200 clinical specimens and there was a published paper associated with it.
The final cleaned datasets included a total of 6,300 specimens, and 3,733 unique localities from across the SDTF biome distribution.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com