Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Yield load and ultimate load for each specimen were compared in Fig. 8.
Hardness and wear resistance of different areas in thixoforged specimen were compared with conventional specimen.
The results of the tracer tests with this acrylic specimen were compared with those with complex pore structure fractures that had the same permeation cross section area as the 4.0-mm-diameter circular hole.
Lewis phenotypes using various types of specimen were compared with the Lewis phenotype predicted from Lewis and Secretor genotypes.
Also, the serially cut specimens (20 slides altogether per specimen) were compared with their corresponding MR images.
Results obtained with the PCR/ESI-MS technology for each specimen were compared with those obtained using conventional microbiology methods for the same sample.
Similar(53)
The material properties measured on micro specimen are compared to large scale standard tensile test results.
Consequently, the susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement of each specimen was compared with the results for 4-h immersion.
The results of fatigue loading on the new specimen are compared with the results of fatigue loading in a cylindrical pressure vessel and a standard specimen.
Based on the test results, the damage behavior, lateral strength, displacement ductility ratio, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation of the specimen are compared.
Stresses from FEA at the crack front on different planes of the specimen are compared with those determined by the J A2 three-term solution.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com