Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Histopathology of the surgical specimen was reviewed.
In all instances, the specimen was reviewed by at least one board certified neuropathologist.
If there was disagreement, the specimen was reviewed until consensus was reached.
11 In case of divergent polarising microscopy results, the specimen was reviewed by a third investigator who made the final determination regarding the presence of MSU crystals.
Gross pathological record of the specimen was reviewed by 2 pathologists to confirm the tumor's location, boundary, capsule, shape, necrotic and cystic components, hemorrhage, and tumor thrombosis observed on CT imaging.
The histopathology of each collected specimen was reviewed to confirm adequacy of the sample (i.e., minimal contamination with non-neoplastic elements) and to assess the extent of tumoral necrosis and cellularity.
Similar(54)
The CT images of each specimen were reviewed and no bony deformity was noted.
The paraffin-embedded sections derived from metastatic tissue specimen were reviewed by one of the authors (RH).
Medical records and haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of the specimen were reviewed by a single pathologist.
Tumor pathology and quality (> 70% tumor cells) of tumor specimens was reviewed by one pathologist (GC).
The study protocol for analyzing clinical records and surgical specimens was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Board of the Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Oral Life Sciencee).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com