Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(2)
Finally, we highlight blind spots and inconsistencies in previous research in order to specify the questions and hypotheses guiding the present study.
Although the study did not specify the questions used within the kiosk, there was no association between the ease of kiosk use and participant education level.
Similar(57)
For each study, we specified the questions or criteria used for the MOH diagnosis, and specified if these questions were validated or not.
* Unless otherwise specified, the question(s) was/were designed by the Diabetes MILES – The Netherlands research team.
However, compared to reviews of bench studies, they were less prone to bias as they specified the question (96.6% vs. 80%, p = 0.04), searched multiple databases (60% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.01), assessed study quality (50% vs. 20%, p = 0.01), and explored heterogeneity between studies (33.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.001) more often.
Compared to reviews of bench studies, they were less prone to bias as they specified the question (96.6% vs. 80%, p = 0.04), searched multiple databases (60% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.01), assessed study quality (50% vs. 20%, p = 0.01), and explored heterogeneity (33.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.001) more often.
The Navigation Guide methodology involves four steps: Specify the study question: Frame a specific question relevant to decision makers about whether human exposure to a chemical or class of chemicals or other environmental exposure is a health risk.
The approach we used to further specify the review question was highly iterative, modifying the question in response to search results and findings from retrieved items.
Methods: We applied the first 3 steps of the Navigation Guide methodology to human epidemiological data: 1) specify the study question, 2) select the evidence, and 3) rate the quality and strength of the evidence.
They will specify the research question, the dimensions to be evaluated, and the strategies to implement in order to conduct this HTA, notably regarding patient involvement in the next stages of the process.
We assembled a review team to include experts in the fields of risk assessment, environmental health, epidemiology, biology, systematic review, and toxicology to develop a protocol to address each step: 1) Specify the study question; 2) select the evidence; and 3) rate the quality and strength of the evidence (Woodruff et al. 2011a).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com