specified in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "specified in" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to details or information that are outlined or defined in a particular document or context. Example: "The terms of the agreement are specified in the contract that both parties signed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That song isn't specified in the playtext.

The Guardian

The year is usually specified in the fund's name.

The New York Times

The nine weeks specified in the contract elapsed.

The New York Times

These are specified in our published entry requirements.

The Guardian

The substance involved is not specified in the case papers.

The Guardian - Sport

The fine print was specified in standard operating procedures (SOPs).

The Economist

These exceptions are generally specified in advance and strictly enforced.

Encyclopedia Britannica

(Dimensions specified in mm).

ROBOMECH Journal

are specified in later assistants.

Speech Communication

random variables specified in (3.10).

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Pricing and release details were not specified in the release.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "specified in" to clearly indicate that details or information are precisely defined within a particular document, section, or standard to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "specified in" when simpler alternatives like "in" or "on" are sufficient. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound overly formal or bureaucratic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "specified in" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb. It indicates that certain details or information are explicitly defined or outlined in a particular location, such as a document, table, or section. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

22%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The prepositional phrase "specified in" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that details are explicitly defined within a certain source. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase serves to direct the audience to a precise location for particular information, ensuring clarity. While used across varied registers, it finds frequent application in science, news, and formal documents. For more informal contexts, less formal alternatives like "outlined in" may be suitable, but overall, "specified in" remains a versatile and reliable choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

outlined in

Focuses on the act of presenting the main features or elements in a clear and organized manner.

detailed in

Emphasizes the presence of extensive information and particulars.

defined in

Highlights the provision of a clear and precise meaning or explanation.

indicated in

Suggests a more subtle or indirect way of pointing out information.

described in

Focuses on providing a comprehensive account or representation.

stipulated in

Implies a formal agreement or condition that is explicitly stated.

set forth in

Suggests a formal and structured presentation of information or rules.

contained within

Highlights the presence of information within a particular document or source.

mentioned in

Suggests a brief or passing reference to something.

identified in

Focuses on pinpointing or recognizing specific information or elements.

FAQs

How do I use "specified in" in a sentence?

Use "specified in" to indicate that particular details or instructions can be found in a particular document or section. For example, "The dimensions are "detailed in" the appendix".

What are some alternatives to "specified in"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "outlined in", "detailed in", "defined in", or "indicated in" to convey a similar meaning.

What's the difference between "specified in" and "mentioned in"?

"Specified in" implies that something is described with detail and precision in a certain location, whereas "mentioned in" simply means it was briefly referenced. Details that are "outlined in" a contract are more important than details "mentioned in" passing.

Is it better to say "specified in the document" or "specified within the document"?

"Specified in the document" is generally preferred as it is more concise and direct. "Specified within the document" is also correct but can sound more wordy. The simpler phrasing generally improves readability.