Sentence examples for specificity and preference from inspiring English sources

First described at the Department of Pathology-Makerere University, Uganda by the Pathologist J.N.P Davies in 1948[3], the important features of this disease namely, geographical distribution, cardiac specificity and preference for the socioeconomically poor, have evaded a complete scientific explanation despite the intense scientific scrutiny to which the disease has been subjected[4], [5].

Substrate specificity and preference were investigated by heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae.

In accord with the relaxed substrate specificity and preference for 2, we find that Cg10062 is irreversibly inactivated by both enantiomers, with the (R) enantiomer being more potent.

Host specificity and varietal preference of released agents, climatic suitability of a region for released agents, number of agents introduced and range or area of infestation appear to play a role in limiting biocontrol success.

TAFIa, however, is a carboxypeptidase with broad substrate specificity and a preference for removal of carboxyl-terminal arginine residues [ 103].

The difference in the expression pattern between testican-1 and testican-2 was that the laminar specificity and area preference of the testican-1 mRNA signal distribution were clearer than those of testican-2 (Fig. 3 E – L ).

The provided draft genome of G. salaris can now facilitate the development of diagnostic markers, and provides a platform for future investigations of the genomic basis of the varying pathogenicity, host specificity, and -preference of various strains of G. salaris.

The degree of preference for proline varies slightly in the deepest alternative reconstruction, but the general trend of evolution from +1P preference, to expanded specificity, and finally to +1R preference, is maintained.

Evolutionary analyses on additional species will be required, though, to address the potential of coevolution for cGAS product specificity and STING binding preferences (Kranzusch et al. 2014).

Given how large and diverse the rhomboid protease family is [less than 15% of sequence identity in the conserved region (Koonin et al, 2003)], it is expected that substrate specificity and S4 subsite preferences may differ among phylogenetic clusters of rhomboids.

Our analyses quantify the fact that host range and preference from host specificity tests are not sufficient to predict ecological impact if the introduced natural enemy is not strictly monophagous.