Sentence examples for specifications of the content from inspiring English sources

The obvious question to ask, once this preliminary point is in play, is 'What constraints are imposed upon specifications of the content of propositional attitudes by the requirement to respect the way the subject thinks about the truth-condition of the relevant attitude?' Certain theories of content and concepts directly entail the conceptual constraint.

Textbooks and other writings on EBM provide us with further specifications of the content and the scope of the EB concept [ 14].

Giving a non-circular specification of the content of the modal fiction is one of the very difficult challenges facing the strong modal fictionalist.

However, such a specification of the content of perception does not completely capture the way the world perceptually appears to us.

O'Neill's argument does not rely on any specification of the content of the obligations that might be owed by adults to children.

In other words, a specification of the content of perception can be sensitive to how an organism perceptually represents its environment even though it utilizes concepts the organism need not possess.

Velleman's alternative specification of the content is (roughly again, because there is some room for variation) to know what one is doing when one acts, or to make sense to oneself when one acts (Velleman 1989).

For example, the argument from the fine grained nature of experience generally begins by arguing that one need not have the concepts involved in the correct specification of the content of perception in order to undergo a perception with that content, e.g., one need not have the concept red27 in order to have a perception correctly specifiable in terms of such a concept.

Thus even if the conceptualists manage to show that subjects do possess all the concepts involved in the correct specification of the content of perception, it still does not show that the content of perception is conceptual, it only undercuts the motivation the nonconceptualist can obtain from the fineness of grain argument (Coliva 2003, Bermúdez 2007).

However, since they lack concepts appropriate for a correct specification of the contents of their perception, their perceptual representation of this state of affairs must be nonconceptual.

The point of the fineness of grain argument is to put pressure on the possibility of a subject possessing all the concepts required for a correct specification of the contents of perception.