Sentence examples for specifications content from inspiring English sources

Fig. 12 A multilayered perspective of contributions to participation-enabling packages at the application and infrastructure layers, to executable specifications (content schemata and workflow schemata) at the participation-enabling layers, and to informational artifacts instantiated from artifacts at these lower layers (information layer).

While executable artifacts exist in the form of executable specifications (content and workflow schemata) in the content repository, too, the majority of executable artifacts in the analyzed system are classical software artifacts (programs written in Tcl, Javascript, SQL and HTML templates as used by OpenACS).

Additional file 12 A multilayered perspective of contributions to participation-enabling packages at the application and infrastructure layers, to executable specifications (content schemata and workflow schemata) at the participation-enabling layers, and to informational artifacts instantiated from artifacts at these lower layers (information layer).

Bring into play the following specifications: Content with recent episodes.

By adhering to a single specification, content owners and makers of devices like portable media players and home media networks can better ensure that their products work together and that their copyrights are protected.

Reverification is the act of verifying if a product item satisfies its performance or detail specification content or if a whole system satisfies the content of the system specification.

They hold that specifications of content must respect the way a thinker, perceiver or speaker apprehends the world and because of this they cannot be circumscribed by the concepts possessed by the thinker, perceiver or speaker.

The direct participation is expressed by the number of individuals providing or modifying artifacts without intermediation and by the number of provided and co-developed artifacts, which are categorized in multiple layers ranging from source code over specifications to content.

It holds that specifications of content need not be sensitive to how the speaker or thinker apprehends the world, at least if one thinks that such sensitivity requires a degree of aspectuality that possible worlds semantics explicitly rejects.[3] Of course, the plausibility of a local lifting of the conceptual constraint will be a function of how concepts are understood.

They are screens but "lesser" so because they don't have the same specifications or content.

We then give proofs of two specifications for content- delivery in CCN.