Sentence examples for specifications compared from inspiring English sources

Broad input-output measures that are collected annually provide consistent efficiency rankings across specifications, compared to specifications that utilize specific measures collected infrequently.

In addition, with this practice, the innovators may hold their products to a tighter specifications compared to generics, which may be approved for a specific market that allows less rigorous specifications.

Additionally, the Lenovo ThinkPad laptops pass more military specifications compared to Dell's ATG laptops and Panasonic's business-rugged and semi-rugged laptops1.

In the employment regressions, the positive effect of higher skills increases in both specifications compared to the baseline OLS estimate in the pooled sample of countries [rows (4) and (5) of Table 2].

These tools are designed for higher pressure and temperature specifications compared to the reservoir conditions normally seen in coalbed methane (CBM), commonly called coal seam gas (CSG) in Australia.

On 11 October 2012 Samsung unveiled the Galaxy S III Mini, a 4 inches smartphone with lower specifications compared to the S III.

Note the lack of R7 and accessory photoreceptors in the Bolwig organ which is likely explained through precocious termination of cell fate specification compared to adult ommatidial development.

This represents a more detailed specification compared to Bouis et al. (2012), who look only at the median, maximum and minimum, with the latter two likely to be sensitive to outliers.

The results for the probit estimation are quite similar to those of the OLS estimation for most variables as can be seen in the right column of Table 2. Noteworthy is, however, that the coefficient of physician quality and life expectancy are a little bit higher using probit specification compared to OLS.

In the categorical distance specification, compared with the reference category (> 2,000 m from an airport), children living within 500 m of an airport had blood lead levels that were, on average, 4.4% higher (coefficient = 0.043; 95% CI, 0.006 0.080) (Table 3).

The RFPM, on the other hand, more accurately estimates most of the probabilities with no change in the model specification compared to the modeling done for Models 1 and 2 earlier.