Sentence examples for specification of content from inspiring English sources

The entailment is established by noting the first motivation for the conceptual constraint, mentioned above (section 2), regarding the proper specification of content.

Regarding the technical and didactic learning experiences, students mainly described the benefits from the tutorial's specification of content.

These have been widely considered to be manifestations of the Hawthorne effect, though this term has been applied in many different ways and is not helpful when used without specification of content [ 17].

They hold that specifications of content must respect the way a thinker, perceiver or speaker apprehends the world and because of this they cannot be circumscribed by the concepts possessed by the thinker, perceiver or speaker.

To say that they are global accounts is just to say that they purport to be accounts of content tout court, rather than specifications of content circumscribed to a particular representational domain (such as the three domains mentioned in the section above).

It holds that specifications of content need not be sensitive to how the speaker or thinker apprehends the world, at least if one thinks that such sensitivity requires a degree of aspectuality that possible worlds semantics explicitly rejects.[3] Of course, the plausibility of a local lifting of the conceptual constraint will be a function of how concepts are understood.

Thus even if the conceptualists manage to show that subjects do possess all the concepts involved in the correct specification of the content of perception, it still does not show that the content of perception is conceptual, it only undercuts the motivation the nonconceptualist can obtain from the fineness of grain argument (Coliva 2003, Bermúdez 2007).

For example, the argument from the fine grained nature of experience generally begins by arguing that one need not have the concepts involved in the correct specification of the content of perception in order to undergo a perception with that content, e.g., one need not have the concept red27 in order to have a perception correctly specifiable in terms of such a concept.

Giving a non-circular specification of the content of the modal fiction is one of the very difficult challenges facing the strong modal fictionalist.

O'Neill's argument does not rely on any specification of the content of the obligations that might be owed by adults to children.

However, such a specification of the content of perception does not completely capture the way the world perceptually appears to us.