Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Specifically, compared with the normal cognitive subjects, the AD group exhibited decreased functional connectivities at the threshold of P < 0.05 (FDR-corrected)).
Specifically, compared with the AT haplotype (in order of rs3742330 and rs13078), the haplotype AA had HR of 1.51 (95% CI = 0.99 2.31) and the haplotype GA was associated with increased HR of 2.04 (95% CI = 1.00 4.15).
Specifically, compared with the cells not treated with 1,25-VD, the treated cells exhibited an 18-26% lower level of γH2AX expression in which the S phase cells were more affected compared to G1 or G2M phase cells.
Specifically, compared with the size of the file compressed in the given order (Table 2), the size of the compressed file produced by Mince when the reads were given in alignment-sorted order was only 0.2% smaller, while the SCALCE file was only 3.2% smaller.
Similar(56)
Specifically, compared with those with low blood lead, those with high blood lead had an additional 0.03 ng/mL increase in log TNF-R2 (i.e., additional 1% increase in GM of TNF-R2) across time (p-interaction = 0.01).
Specifically, compared with HapMap, the 1000G resource doubles the number of variants that are in LD with each GWAS index SNP [ Abecasis et al., 2012 ].
= degree of freedom Table 3 shows the significant risk factors and the estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals as specified in model 2. Specifically, compared with patients in the placebo group, patients in the pravastatin group had a 29%95%5% CI 17 - 39%) reduction in the risk for the both MI events.
Specifically, compared with Cf/Mg composite, the interlaminar shear strength and bending strength of Cf/Mg-Gd-Zn composite were improved by 26.4% and 25.7%, respectively.
Specifically, compared with women in the lowest tertile of polyunsaturated fat relative to saturated fat intake, those in the highest tertile declined an average of 0.08 standard units less (95% CI 0.008 0.16).
Though case-based learning was not specifically compared with other techniques in the literature reviewed, it was often noted as a method in articles that discussed interactive techniques.
Specifically, compared with no DEE exposure, the RR for a lifetime exposure at an average of 0.8 μg/m based on Janssen et al. (2011) would be approximately 1.03, compared with RR = 1.05 [exp(0.000982 × 70 years × 0.8 μg/m)] based on our slope estimate (75 years exposure, 5-year lag).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com