Sentence examples for specific necessity and concerns from inspiring English sources

Adjusted Specific Necessity and Concerns scale scores were calculated by dividing total scores by the number of items in the scale (possible range 1 5).

In a study from the UK on predictors of adherence to secondary preventive treatment after stroke, associations between BMQ-specific (Necessity and Concern) and adherence were tested.

There are five statements in Specific-necessity and Specific-concerns scales and therefore the total sum of possible scores in these scales would range from 5 to 25.

Correlations between adherence to treatment and the Specific-Necessity and Specific-Concerns scales, along with their difference (cost-benefit analysis) have been reported in diverse diseases and countries and across multiple measures of adherence [ 1- 17, 18] 18].

In addition to these general beliefs items, the BMQ includes subscales addressing perceived necessity and concerns regarding specific medication types; these were not used in the current study because of the complexity of addressing these domains simultaneously for the two medication types in the context of the other predictors of interest.

The BMQ is a validated instrument [ 1, 19] containing 5 scales (Appendix 1), each with 4 5 items: (1) General-Overuse, (2) General-Harm, (3) General-Benefit, (4) Specific-Necessity, and (5) Specific-Concerns.

This meta-analysis investigated whether beliefs in the necessity and concerns of medicine and the necessity concerns differential are correlated with medication adherence on a population level and in different conditions.

Item means are computed for the Necessity and Concerns subscales.

Missing data: Mean ICS necessity and concerns values were calculated.

The BMQ-specific is a self-report questionnaire with separate versions for parents and children (≥11 years) to quantify beliefs in terms of necessity and concerns about treatment.

Consistent with the development of the scales [ 2], high necessity and concerns were defined as scores above the midpoint, and four groups were defined: accepting (high necessity, low concerns), ambivalent (high necessity, high concerns), indifferent (low necessity, low concerns), and skeptical (low necessity, high concerns) [ 11].