specific evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

"specific evidence" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to information or data which is relevant and precise in order to support a particular claim. For example: "The prosecution presented specific evidence to support their allegations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He declined to cite the specific evidence.

The New York Times

The European study provides no specific evidence about the exam.

The New York Times - Health

What specific evidence can you find to support your claims.

The New York Times

(He did not provide any specific evidence for this).

The New Yorker

What specific evidence is cited to support that claim?

The New York Times

However, specific evidence is still lacking.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

What kinds of specific evidence do we have about waste?

The Washington Post

The most helpful comments provide specific evidence for all claims.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It's not boasting if you can demonstrate specific evidence to back these up.

The Guardian

So far no specific evidence of human-Neanderthal interbreeding has been found, Dr. Egholm said.

The New York Times - Science

"You have to look at the specific evidence in a specific case, what's provable," he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting arguments, always support claims with "specific evidence" to enhance credibility and persuasiveness.

Common error

Avoid making broad statements without providing "specific evidence". General claims lack impact and may be easily dismissed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "specific evidence" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to concrete information used to support a claim or argument. As Ludwig AI clarifies, the phrase is both grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "specific evidence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase that serves to bolster arguments and claims across diverse contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is indeed correct and usable. Its strength lies in providing tangible, verifiable support, making it suitable for formal, academic, news, and business communication. Remember to favor "specific evidence" over generalities to improve the persuasiveness and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

concrete evidence

Emphasizes the tangible and verifiable nature of the evidence.

particular evidence

Highlights the distinct and individual nature of the evidence.

precise evidence

Focuses on the accuracy and exactness of the evidence.

detailed evidence

Stresses the comprehensive and thorough nature of the evidence.

explicit evidence

Highlights the clarity and directness of the evidence.

definitive evidence

Indicates that the evidence is conclusive and leaves no room for doubt.

tangible proof

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", emphasizing the undeniable nature of the supporting information.

verifiable data

Shifts the focus to data that can be independently confirmed.

documented facts

Emphasizes the recorded and factual nature of the evidence.

circumstantial details

Focuses on the indirect and suggestive nature of the evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "specific evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "specific evidence" to strengthen your claims. For example, "The lawyer presented "compelling evidence", including witness testimonies and forensic reports".

What are some alternatives to "specific evidence"?

Alternatives include "concrete evidence", "particular evidence", or "precise evidence". The best choice depends on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to provide general evidence or "specific evidence"?

"Specific evidence" is always preferable as it provides clarity and supports your arguments more effectively than general evidence. Providing "general statements" without backing them up makes it more difficult to trust your claims.

What's the difference between "specific evidence" and "circumstantial evidence"?

"Specific evidence" directly proves a fact, while "circumstantial evidence" relies on inference to connect the dots. Direct evidence holds more weight in most cases.