Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Some public health specialists disagree with this policy.
This compilation from the 1st century bce or ce (specialists disagree on the exact date of its completion) has been restored based on two main sources.
And inevitably, specialists disagree as to what kinds of material indication can be viewed as satisfactory proxies for symbolic cognition.
GPs and specialists disagree on several aspects of their communication.
Similar(56)
GPs and specialists disagreed on whether GPs adequately followed specialists' recommendations in the specialist's report.
The specialists disagreed: a third (32.8%) of the specialists thought GPs can be well-reached by telephone (p < 0.001).
Overall, 90% of specialists disagreed regarding a lack of time for engaging in prevention counselling and PrEP monitoring; 79% would welcome formal guidelines, while those with a negative attitude did not consider this advisable.
In a small percentage of cases a broader than necessary spectrum plus an unnecessary class of drugs was mentioned (Table 4).>> In 52 cases, the specialists disagreed between themselves (Table 5); specialist #1 found that the regimen was inadequate in 24 cases and specialist #2 found it inadequate in 28 cases.
In the 52 cases where the specialists disagreed between themselves, diagnoses were limited to four groups (Table 6): empiric use (empiric introduction and/or change of the antimicrobial regimen without initial identification of the infection site), sepsis, acute respiratory failure (ARF), and antimicrobial regimen changed after a positive culture was reported.
In 29 % of the cases the specialists disagreed with each other, which may be explained by individual professional characteristics [ 13, 22], differing choices of empirical therapy, experience and years of practice, and difficulties of using more sensitive microbiological methods for diagnosis.
But there are still pain specialists who disagree.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com