Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
There were no significant differences in the risk for having an AMI between the subgroups of specialists, age, or geographical area (Table 3).
The questionnaire being anonymous, specialists' age and more important the hospital and specialist group they are based in were not available for analysis.
*Background location missing for 76 GPs and 61 specialists; Age missing for 4 specialists Table 2 shows the association between rural background (both duration and location) and current place of practice for both GPs and specialists.
Grouped data on demographic characteristics (age and sex) were obtained for general practitioners from the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing's Medicare data and for specialists (age, sex and hours worked), from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare's (AIHW) annual Medical Labour Force Surveys.
Similar(56)
So you know clinical nurse specialists aged 0 3, probably 80-90% of their time is spent on that group.
For example, 2% of specialists aged 45-49 years in 1995 had left the workforce by the year 2000, when they were aged 50-54.
Physician specialists aged 40 59 years on both APP part-time (63.3%) and full-time (51%) plans were more likely to respond to the survey.
The results of this study indicate that by 2020, 78% of general practitioners aged 45-49 in 2005, and 93% of specialists aged 45-49 in 2005 will have retired from the workforce.
The cohorts were formed by grouping the number of general medical practitioners or specialists in the relevant five year age groups at a base year - e.g. all the specialists aged between 25 and 29 years in 1995 were grouped together to form one cohort: the 25-29 year-old specohortt cohort.
Inclusion criteria were: no chronic illness, not being under treatment of a medical specialist, age between 6 and 20 years, and the capability to understand and read the Dutch language.
[Family Medicine Specialist (aged 50 years); 12 years of experience] "We don't actually give patient any fall education material apart from just saying it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com