During the last decade three global land cover datasets have been created, i.e. the GLC-2000, MODIS and GlobCover, but comparison studies have shown that there are large spatial discrepancies between these three products.
To assess the influence of spatial discrepancies between PET and CT data due to respiratory and cardiac motion, equivalence between original and realigned tumor uptake values was assessed per patient separately for thoracic and extra-thoracic lesions.
The model predicted the oscillation phase inversion between L2/3 and L1, but not the spatial variation in gamma power within layers, suggesting directions for further research into the cause of the spatial discrepancies between theoretically predicted and experimentally measured LFPs.
After stitching, investigation of the overlap of neighboring captures revealed there was no spatial discrepancy visible between separate captures.
The normalized spatial discrepancy parameter (NSD) indicates the similarity between 20 independently generated ab initio models.
The NSD (normalized spatial discrepancy), which is a measure of similarity between sets of three-dimensional points [ 29], was computed between all 10 reconstructions, with a range of NSD from 0.396 to 0.476.
With regard to large-scale discrepancy between AOD and PM2.5 that might mask smaller-scale correspondence, we used AOD and PM2.5 data to estimate and adjust (our calibrated AOD) for large-scale spatial discrepancy that persists over time but found that this did not improve matters, suggesting that small-scale discrepancy between PM2.5 and AOD is a major concern.
Geographically, the greatest spatial discrepancies were in the Piedmont region.
A discrepancy between verbal and spatial abilities is a core feature of NVLD, and we previously found that a greater verbal-spatial discrepancy is associated with increased thinning and decreased function in fronto-parietal and temporal regions in healthy individuals (Margolis et al., 2013; Margolis et al., 2017).
In contrast, spatial realignment is a result of the registered difference between the performance expected from a feed-forward movement plan and the performance achieved under feedback control, signalling a discrepancy between spatial maps.
