Sentence examples for source trial from inspiring English sources

The archive holds only anonymised data, and the source trial is not disclosed as per VISTA guidelines.

It is not known whether the absence of significant associations between funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality reflects a true absence of an association or is an artefact of inadequate statistical power, reliance on voluntary disclosure of funding information, a focus on trials recently published in the top medical journals, or some combination thereof.

As a result of these limitations, we are unable to conclude, with a high degree of confidence, that the absence of an association between funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality that was documented in this study reflects a benefit of strengthened disclosure requirements at the top general medical journals.

In order to examine the relationships between funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality, recent issues of five peer-reviewed, high impact factor, general medical journals were hand-searched to identify a sample of 100 randomized controlled trials (20 trials/journal).

Because relationships between funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality may bias study results, making informed decision making about the merits of an intervention more difficult for clinicians and consumers alike, it is important to examine the extent to which a trial's source of funding influences its results.

A limitation of the economic analysis was the narrow clinical evidence base: the source trial of effectiveness data (Mawhood and Howlin, 1999) had a small sample size (N = 50); moreover, its quasi-experimental design may have introduced bias in the analysis due to confounding factors (Morgan et al., 2000).

Raw data source trials ST1a ST5j (50 trials Antia 2015b) Open image in new window Fig. 6 Catalyst A: interpreted thermodynamic parameters.

Given study age, both industry associated (OR = 0.21; CI95% [0.12 0.38]) and unknown funding source trials (OR = 0.33; (CI95% [0.21 0.51]) had a lower annual failure rates compared with non-industry associated trials.

The longer RTs for the No Source than Source trials are consistent with both hypotheses.

Limitations of our study follow from limitations in the source trials.

Furthermore, a recent event-related potential (ERP) study showed that the comparison between correct and incorrect source trials yielded similar ERP effects as the comparison between high and low confidence correct source trials (Woroch and Gonsalves, 2010), supporting our assertion that high confidence source hits are dissociable from other source hits and incorrect source trials.