source for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'source for' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a source that provides something or someone, as in "I'll look for a good source for organic produce in my area."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The source for Birth.Movies.Death.Death

The Guardian - Film

Her source for the white bedside table?

The New York Times

Another source for rooting is RootzWiki (rootzwiki.com).

The New York Times - Tech

Here is a rich source for rumination.

Independent

Your source for global business solutions".

The New York Times - Magazine

What is your source for this statement?

The New Yorker

The source for the Red Storm's woes?

The New York Times - Sports

The best online news source for Chile.

The Guardian

The source for these was Marcal.

The New York Times

Source for high court case: PA.

The Guardian

Leading online news source for Chile.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "source for" when indicating where information, materials, or support originates. For instance, "This website is a reliable "source for" historical data".

Common error

Avoid using "source of" when "source for" is more appropriate. "Source of" typically refers to the origin of something intangible like a feeling or problem, while "source for" refers to a provider of something tangible or informational.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "source for" functions primarily as a noun phrase acting as an attributive modifier. It designates the origin, provider, or supplier of something, as shown in Ludwig's examples such as "The best online news "source for" Chile".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "source for" is a versatile and commonly used term that serves to identify where something originates or can be obtained. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically sound and frequently used across various contexts, from news and media to scientific research and general knowledge. The analysis reveals that "source for" is most often used in neutral register, making it appropriate for a wide range of writing styles. Remember to use "source for" to specify providers of information or materials, while reserving "source of" for origins and causes. Pay attention to similar phrases, such as ""resource for"" or "origin of", to ensure the most precise and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resource for

Implies a supply that can be drawn upon when needed.

provider of

Stresses the act of supplying or furnishing something.

origin of

Focuses on the starting point or genesis of something.

supply of

Refers to the quantity of something available.

basis for

Highlights the foundation or justification for something.

root of

Indicates the fundamental or essential part.

foundation of

Implies a structural or conceptual base.

cause of

Emphasizes the reason or event that leads to a result.

derivation of

Highlights how something is obtained or developed from a source.

wellspring of

Suggests an abundant and continuous supply.

FAQs

How can I use "source for" in a sentence?

You can use "source for" to indicate where something comes from, such as "This book is an excellent "resource for" research" or "The internet is a primary "provider of" information".

What's the difference between "source for" and "source of"?

"Source for" typically indicates a provider or supplier, while "source of" refers to the origin or cause. For example, "This website is a "source for" reliable news", but "Stress can be a "source of" headaches".

What can I say instead of "source for"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "origin of", ""resource for"", or ""provider of"". Consider the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is "source for information" grammatically correct?

Yes, "source for information" is grammatically correct and commonly used. It indicates where information can be obtained, such as "This database is a valuable "source for" scientific information".