"They are usually in a somewhat valuable location".
For the indirect effects domain, the effects measured were all observed to be somewhat valuable.
Participants received an email link to complete an electronic survey in which they rated the general value of "having a trained facilitator for group work," using a Likert-type scale with values of 1 = not at all valuable, 2 = somewhat valuable, 3 = extremely valuable, and N/A.
Productivity-related gains and indirect effects were seen to be somewhat valuable.
The FT overall received a mean rating of 2.73, with all attendees indicating the training as either somewhat valuable (n = 8) or very valuable (n = 22, 86% responding).
Evaluation surveys were administered in paper format immediately after each FT. Attendees rated individual components of the FT workshop on a Likert-like scale with 1 = not at all valuable, 2 = somewhat valuable, and 3 = very valuable.
At the site in which the mini-RMT workshop was included, all attendees found it either somewhat valuable (n = 1), valuable (n = 1), or very valuable (n = 5), with 100% reporting.
At the end of the workshop, attendees were asked to rate individual components of the FT on a Likert-like scale with values of 1 = not at all valuable, 2 = somewhat valuable, and 3 = very valuable.
Thus, the utility of blood samples in family-based cohorts to study complex genetic diseases are somewhat limited to studies of genetic predisposition and less valuable for functional studies.
Although this perspective has been valuable for curriculum and instruction, it is also somewhat limited in scope.
