Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Because most people who call something "subjective" imply the additional term merely.
"I'm not sure the average person thinks of 'average' or 'percentile' in quite that literal a sense," Dr. Funder said, "so 'above average' might mean to them 'pretty good,' or 'O.K.,' or 'doing all right.' And if, in fact, people mean something subjective when they use the word, then it's really hard to evaluate whether they're right or wrong using the statistical criterion".
I read up on it to try and understand the world at the time; the political climate, the social climate, the cultural climate, the economic climate… until those things hopefully turned from something objective to something subjective.
In this manner Fichte deduces what he calls "the principle of all practical philosophy," viz., that something objective (a being) follows from something subjective (a concept), and hence that the I must ascribe to itself a power of free purposiveness or causality in the sensible world.
I'm interested in creating something subjective, but also translating something from my eye to the canvas is a subjective process in itself.
Similar(55)
My three fairly obvious propositions are: first, in Freud's formulation from Civilisation and its Discontents, "happiness is something essentially subjective" (subjective I take it, in the sense of being not only personal but idiosyncratic).
So, assuming 'probably' means something like subjective probability Probably, if p, q means that the subjective probability of p → q, and, assuming the agent is coherent, that is true just in case the subjective probability of q given p is high.
Happiness "is something essentially subjective," Freud wrote.
What happens to it when you document something as subjective as the end of a relationship?
"And it's a self-report of something completely subjective," Rakowski said.
All parties talk vaguely of "fairness", something so subjective that it means nothing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com