Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "someone in question" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a specific person being discussed or considered in a particular context.
Example: "The committee will review the application of the candidate, and the decision will be based on the qualifications of someone in question."
Alternatives: "the person concerned" or "the individual in question."
Exact(2)
It was not an auspicious start to the day when Chip Olson awoke and realized that he was sharing his bed with someone else, and that the someone in question was Joshua Milrad.
By Rebecca Mead It was not an auspicious start to the day when Chip Olson awoke and realized that he was sharing his bed with someone else, and that the someone in question was Joshua Milrad.
Similar(58)
Is the person in question, someone you have given general assistance to?
A good test: Is the person in question, someone you have given specific assistance to?
Someone in Cannes questioned the last character, whether it was correct, and I went into a panic.
One can even be judged to have defamed someone when the allegation in question is true.
With the tenure of the show's other founding star, Mariska Hargitay, in question, someone is going to have to step up and take charge.
Type "fanute" into Twitter's search, and you'll probably see a new tweet surface every 30 seconds or so, with someone misquoting the lyric in question (sometimes ironically) or asking what "fanute" means or just jokingly using it in a sentence.
Directions This activity, in which someone in character is questioned by a group, might be used after Role on the Wall to go deeper, or could be used on its own.
At a gathering to vent against President Barack Obama's tax and health policies and alleged socialism, someone in the audience questioned how the movement could use the Federalist Papers, largely written by Alexander Hamilton, as any basis for its beliefs.
The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Miranda v. Arizona applies only to interrogation of someone in custody, so the question for the California courts was whether Mr. Alvarado was "in custody" for purposes of applying the Miranda rule even though he was never told that he could not leave.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com