Amongst the methodologies for analyzing consumer preferences, some studies asked interviewees to rank attributes according to their perceived importance (Del Giudice and D'Elia 2001).
Some studies asked symptoms over a very long or unspecified time [3], [9], [16], [18] whereas some did not exactly describe symptom classification, questions asked, or time concerning the symptom question [7], [8], [10], [14], [15].
Some studies asked about the GPs' "ever use" of exercise whilst others asked about specific cases.
Some of these studies used microbiological tools for the monitoring of fungal disease, e.g., fungal PCR techniques, serum galactomannan, or β- d-glucan testing; some studies asked for specific radiological signs such as a halo sign as trigger for initiating preemptive antifungal therapy.
However, there were discrepancies in the FFQ questions, for eg, some studies asked subjects how many times they ate eggs per week, rather than how many eggs they ate, and it is unclear whether eggs included as part of mixed dishes were included in the assessment.
In identified stroke populations, studies ask about falls over some time interval.
These studies ask whether infants, like adults, prefer those who are like them in some way versus those who are not like them.
Nearly all studies ask something about the loss or harm that was incurred by the crime.
None of the studies included women pre-pregnancy, though some qualitative studies asked women at a later phase to reflect back on that period.
The majority of studies asks participants to retrospectively attribute mental states to others.
