Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
We tested five variables: MADRS global score, HAMA psychic and somatic sub-scales, SF-36 psychic, and somatic summary components.
Similar(11)
Indeed, the HAMA somatic sub-scale, which is significantly different in patients with and without migraine symptoms, is composed of seven items related to somatic symptoms (two general somatic, one cardiovascular, one respiratory, one gastro-intestinal, one sexual and urinary, and one autonomic).
There was no significant difference in the predictive effects on depressive symptoms between cognitive and somatic sub-scale factors (p = 0.4).
There was no significant difference in the predictive effects on risk of depression between cognitive and somatic sub-scale factors (p = 0.2). * 95% confidence interval of AUC does not include 0.5 Only three pre/early pubertal participants had depression onset, so we were unable to test whether puberty moderated other risk factors.
We used the Anxiety/Depression, Withdrawn, and Somatic complaints sub-scales of the YSR and CBCL as components of the Internalising symptoms scale of the YSR and CBCL, which has been validated [ 29].
The Internalizing Problems scale combines the Emotionally Reactive, Anxious/Depressed, Somatic Complaints, and Withdrawn sub-scales.
The GHQ28 includes four sub-scales: somatic symptoms, anxiety and insomnia, social dysfunction, and severe depression.
The GHQ-28 is a 28-item measure of emotional distress that is divided into four sub-scales: somatic symptoms, anxiety/insomnia, severe depression and social dysfunction.
The GHQ-28 comprises four sub-scales, Somatic symptoms, Anxiety/Insomnia symptoms, Social Dysfunction and Severe Depression, each with seven questions.
Factor loadings only depicted if 0.5 or more# in the sub-scales: psychological (psych), somatic (somat), and sexual sub-scale (sex).
The 28-item version used in this study consists of four sub-scales: a) somatic symptoms, b) anxiety/insomnia, c) social dysfunction and d) severe depression.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com