Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A sensitivity analysis indicates that the virus-sized colloid transport and deposition is significantly affected by various pore-scale parameters such as the surface potentials on colloid and collector, ionic strength of the solution, flow velocity, pore size and colloid size.
In contrast, Warnken et al. reported DBL layer thicknesses of 230 ± 32 μm in moderate to well stirred solutions, which did not change upon varying the solution flow velocity (i.e., stir rate), and matched well with their estimation of the lateral diffusion flux increase of ∼20%.
Similar(57)
To check this model, the mass transfer coefficients for ferricyanide ions and ferrocyanide ions to, respectively, a hydrogen-evolving and an oxygen-evolving electrode in 1 M KOH and at 298K and various bulk-solution flow velocities have been determined in the usual way.
The investigated operating parameters were solution concentration, flow velocity, and bulk and surface temperatures.
In addition, the absorption rate was increased by a factor of 2.5 when the solution inlet flow velocity was increased from 0.00118 m/s to 0.00472 m/s.
Theoretically, surface modification of the dispersed particles under magnetohydrodynamic forces, mainly Lorentz force, was affected by the conductivity of the solution, the flow velocity of the fluid, the retention time of dispersion in the working channel, and the flux density of the field [[14]].
Variables studied were superficial gas velocity, physical properties of the solution, and swirl flow velocity.
At a specified time and location, and comparing with a frictionless swash solution, the uprush flow velocity reduces due to the bottom resistance, while the flow velocity increases during the initial phase of the backwash owing to the earlier reversal time with the bottom resistance.
Packed column experiments were conducted to investigate the transport and blocking behavior of surfactant- and polymer-stabilized engineered silver nanoparticles (Ag-ENPs) in saturated natural aquifer media with varying content of material < 0.063 mm in diameter (silt and clay fraction), background solution chemistry, and flow velocity.
Figure 2 The streamline of numerical solutions of the flow velocity u.
Figure 8 The (pmb{L^{2}}) -norm error tendency of the numerical solutions of the flow velocity u and the pressure p. Charts (a) and (b) are severally the error of the SFVE and SMFE solutions on (0le tle10le
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com