Sentence examples for solid incidence from inspiring English sources

Although expression of UHRF1 was not associated with difference of gender, numbers of tumour, tumour size, growth pattern (papillary or solid), incidence of recurrence, survival status after 5 years from surgery, and smoking history (P>0.05, Mann Whitney's U-test, Supplementary Figure 1), we found that the expression of UHRF1 correlated with stages (pTa pT4) and grades (grades I III).

And the minimum dose for detection was not inconsistent with the data for solid cancer incidence.

Interestingly, the doubling dose for the GPA Mf approximated that for solid cancer incidence (1.59 Sv).

Tabulations of person-years at risk and other solid cancer incidence cases were created with the DATAB module of the EPICURE software (Preston et al, 1998).

All of these characteristics of the background GPA Mf were in accord with those of solid tumor incidence obtained from an earlier epidemiological study of A-bomb survivors.

The analyses of other solid cancer incidence data are based on first diagnosis but excluded non-melanoma skin cancers because of incomplete registration.

It should be noted that since the ICRP published their analysis in 2003, a study of the solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero has been published (Preston et al. 2008).

The results from all of these models showed that attained age, gender and smoking status were the most important factors in modelling the background rates for other solid cancer incidence.

Taking into account that the liquidators were mainly males around 30 years of age (solid cancer incidence risk factor 0.06 see1 – see NRC 2006, Table 12-6 at p. 281), 100 mSv should cause about a 0.6% life-time cancer incidence on top of the natural 42% (Fig. PS-4, p. 7).

Brenner and Hall (2012) cited the most recently published solid cancer incidence data (Preston et al. 2007) and asserted "about 30,000 atomic bomb survivors who were located several miles from the bomb epicenter did indeed receive organ doses comparable with those from a few CT scans and did show a significant increase in cancer risk".

23 While these two estimates are of similar magnitude, the differences between them may reflect the differences in study design and projection methodology, as well as true differences in disease prevalence over time related to changes in the US population and solid tumor incidence, as well as changes in the cancer treatment landscape and survivorship.