"societal fairness" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
For example, "We must strive to uphold societal fairness in order to promote a sense of justice in our society."
Perhaps it was more that being lectured to about societal "fairness" and "everyone being in it together", when a minority of super-rich were manifestly not going to suffer, finally caused something to snap.
A particularly vocal critic, Professor Paul Cheshire of the London School of Economics, has written that "the unstoppable damage they do to societal fairness, housing affordability, the economic efficiency of our cities, even the environment, is devastating".
The issue of the appropriate level of scrutiny essentially a question of how closely the law's legislative justification comports with commonly acceptable societal standards of fair play, and basic fairness under the Constitution is hotly debated in constitutional-law and gay-rights legal circles, because the level of scrutiny applied by the court in most cases will determine the outcome.
The issue of the appropriate level of scrutiny — essentially a question of how closely the law's legislative justification comports with commonly acceptable societal standards of fair play, and basic fairness under the Constitution — is hotly debated in constitutional-law and gay-rights legal circles, because the level of scrutiny applied by the court in most cases will determine the outcome.
As a society with dramatic shifting demographics, we are now correctly grinding our societal teeth over the fairness politics of everything.
Given the importance of mobility in modern societies, we argue that there is an urgent need for societal ánd policy debates about fairness and for subsequent translation of the outcomes of these debates into adequate principles, standards, and policies for the transport domain.
Given the importance of mobility in modern societies, we argue that there is an urgent need for societal and policy debates about fairness and for subsequent translation of the outcomes of these debates into adequate principles, standards, and policies for the transport domain.
Fairness increases legitimacy and societal buy-in.
The human rights discourse had traction in both groups when discussed at the societal level as far as issues of general fairness, the importance of tolerance, and the prohibition against physical violence and abuse.
The exclusion of old women in the societal perspective is, however, not a trivial consequence from equity or fairness points of view.
In addition to fairness, some argue that the application of the societal perspective in health implies an imbalance because the effect side is only focused on health and therefore it may be considered inconsistent to include all costs.
